Perlindungan Hukum Para Pihak Apabila Terjadi Wanprestasi Lelang Non Eksekusi Sukarela Secara Online Tanpa Pejabat Lelang
Article Sidebar
Main Article Content
Abstract
As explained, auctions basically adopt the characteristics of a sale and purchase agreement (1457 BW), where the elements of price and goods are important elements. The difference is that auctions require the presence of an Auction Officer, especially for execution auctions and mandatory non-execution auctions. Auctions have special regulations (Lex Specialis), namely Vendu Reglement and Vendu Instructie as auction regulations which are still valid today. Apart from that, the implementation of auctions is also regulated in PMK 213/PMK.06/2020 concerning Instructions for Implementing Auctions. Online auctions are carried out through the e-Marketplace Auction Platform where the implementation is usually carried out without an auction official, for example auctions on eBay. The purpose of this research is to determine protection for parties who experience losses due to default. This research is legal research with a statutory approach, conceptual approach and case approach. The research results obtained are that the validity of online voluntary non-execution auctions without the presence of an auction official is valid by adopting the characteristics of a sale and purchase agreement. And the protection for the parties is the legal protection of the parties in the event of default in a non-execution auction, there are 2 (two) namely regulated in the ITE law regarding electronic transactions and Consumer Protection which explains the existence of compensation, as well as by taking legal action to resolve disputes, where the parties can choose resolution either through court, arbitration or other alternative dispute resolution institutions (conventional/online dispute resolution) in accordance with the provisions of the Laws and Regulations as the default is related to responsibility.
Downloads
Article Details
References
Henny Mono, Alternatif Penyelesaian Sengketa dan Mediasi (Bayumedia Publishing 2014).
Hernoko AY, Hukum Perjanjian Asas Proporsionalitas dalam Kontrak Komersial (Kencana 2010).
M. Yahya Harahap, Ruang Lingkup Permasalahan Eksekusi Bidang Perdata (Gramedia 1994).
Made Ray Adityanata, “Upaya Memperoleh Kepastian Hukum Demi Hak Dari Pemenang Suatu Lelang” (2020) 8 Jurnal Kertha Semaya Universitas Udayana.
Made Widnyana, Alternatif Penyelesaian Sengketa dan Arbitrase (Fikahati Aneska 2014).
Mafita, “Pelaksanaan Lelang Melalui Internet Terhadap Aset Barang Milik Negara Pada Kantor Pelayanan Kekayaan Negara Dan Lelang Serang Berdasarkan Asas Kepastian Hukum” (2019) 2 Nurani Hukum: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum.
Mamudji SS dan S, Penelitian Hukum Normatif (Suatu Tinjauan Singkat) (Rajawali Pers 2001).
Margono Dwi Susilo dan Mirza Prasetya, “Lelang dengan Platform e-Marketplace Auction Perbandingan antara eBay dan e-Auction (lelang.go.id)” (DJKN, 2019)
Margono Dwi Susilo dan Mirza Prasetya, “Lelang dengan Platform e-Marketplace Auction Perbandingan antara eBay dan e-Auction (lelang.go.id)” (DJKN, 2019)
Moch. Basarah, Prosedur Alternatif Penyelesaian Sengketa; Arbitrase Tradisional dan Modern (Online) (Genta Publishing 2011).
Peter Mahmud Marzuki, Penelitian Hukum (Kencana Prenada Media Group 2016).
R.Subekti dan R.Tjitrosudibio, Hukum Perjanjian (Intermasa 2005).
Rifqani Nur Fauziah Hanif (KPKNL Manado), “Arbitrase dan Alternatif Penyelesaian Sengketa” (DJKN, 2020) https://www.djkn.kemenkeu.go.id/
Stefanus Halim, “Keabsahan Lelang Barang Milik Swasta Dengan Media Internet Ditinjau Dari Hukum Informasi Dan Transaksi Elektronik Dan Peraturan Lelang” (2015) 4 Jurnal Ilmiah Mahasiswa Universitas Surabaya 1.
Sudikno Mertokusumo, Mengenal Hukum suatu Pengantar (Liberty 1999).